Posted on January 8th, 2014 by Timothy Boyle
I was walking around Kennebunkport earlier this week and as I was about to enter a local kids boutique I noticed a sticker on their door from American Express. The sticker said “Shop Small. Support your local small businesses.” But this sticker went one step further than most similar type stickers you might find on shop windows or bumper stickers. This window sticker contained a QR code which made it far more useful.
Whether you agree with the whole “shop local,” “shop small” movement or not, one must admit that if you do indeed support such a thing it would certainly help to know what the relevant shops were and where they could be found. This is where a QR is able to come into play and help promote shopping local.
In this particular case, when you scanned the QR code you were taken to a mobile optimized landing page with a header stating “Shop small and make a difference in your neighborhood.” From here you can click on one of a various number of buttons such as “dining,” “shopping”, “entertainment” etc.
From there the American express mobile site brings up the various local businesses in the area that fall under those categories. For each business their contact info including phone number and address are listed.
This is a great example of how a simple QR code can greatly enhance a physical advertisement. A sticker simply saying “shop small” is a nice sentiment and all but what good does it really do? You add a QR code and all of a sudden it is more than just sentiment, it becomes useful. Sure you could print out a list of all the local businesses for each category and stick them up all over a window, but that just isn’t practical. A QR code fits the bill perfectly.
This is relevant for any physical advertisement that could benefit from offering more information than just a simple slogan.
For example if you have a physical advertisement that is trying to sell something, or convince someone to act in a certain way, say have someone download your new mobile application, a QR code is a perfect fit. It allows the potential consumer to access more information or be prompted at the moment of peak interest to act in a particular way—such as scanning the code to download said app.
Most physical adverts could benefit from a QR code. Just make sure it is actually serving a purpose and provides the consumer with something they actually would want and/or benefit from.
Also, if you are going to have a sticker similar to American Express, it might be beneficially that the sticker associate with the proper local town, being in Kennebunkport I probably don’t really care what the local stores are in Rensselaerville, NY. A lesson in double checking your QR code landing pages.
| Read more by Timothy Boyle
Posted on January 2nd, 2014 by Jason Summerfield
In recent years the concept of “engagement” has grown to become a staple strategy in marketing, advertising, web development, PR and communications in general. The thinking goes that it’s no longer sufficient to simply get in front of your target audience with your brand’s messaging, you need to interact with them in some fashion for maximum exposure and influence.
This tactic escalated into a trend back when social media began to gain traction as a commercial tool (for better or worse), and has only snowballed with the growth of mobile technologies – now you can engage with just about anyone, anywhere, at any time. It’s a tactic that has filtered down from big brands and agency thought leaders, to mom and pop shops of all types.
When done correctly, interaction that is designed to connect with target audiences can create a deeper relationship with your brand and can be very compelling, so it’s no wonder that “engagement” is what many marketers aspire to as a fundamental tactic for their campaigns.
But the problem is that engagement for the sake of interaction alone can often leave a negative impression, rather than creating a positive impact. Time is the new commodity, and if you ask people to engage for a sub-par experience you are in effect wasting their time, something nobody appreciates.
We’ve all seen examples of attempts at engagement gone wrong:
- Asking people to “Like” or “Follow” a social media channel that is poorly maintained
- Asking people to download an app that is little more than a glorified web page
- Asking people to scan a QR code that simply points to your company’s desktop homepage
- Asking people to sign up for a whitepaper download that is a thinly veiled advertisement
- Asking people to click on a big fat hero graphic that goes to a web page with irrelevant content
These things all ask people to interact, yet produce an unsatisfying user experience, and leave the user wondering “why did these people just waste my time?”
Worse still, if the architects of these types of engagement efforts look at the numbers alone they may actually think they just ran a successful campaign (“Wow, look at how many Likes/downloads/scans/visits we just got!”). But what the numbers don’t tell you is that those are actually the number of people who now think your brand sucks in some way.
So the next time your colleagues or vendors slip the word “engagement” into your campaign strategy discussions, dig a little deeper, and think about whether the idea being proposed is an experience that is likely to leave people feeling satisfied, or cheated at the end of the interaction.
Engage to enhance relationships with your target audiences; engage to build a positive user experience; engage to build value. But never engage to simply interact. After all, “engagement” for the sake of interaction isn’t really a marketing strategy, it’s just a hollow beg for attention.
| Read more by Jason Summerfield